Wikipedians are 80 percent male, more than 65 percent single, more than 85
percent without children, and around 70 percent of them are under the age
of 30.

http://bostonreview.net/BR34.6/morozov.php

ahem, have we already forgot:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cats_with_fraudulent_diplomas

i usually only use it for general information like rules for card games and stuff.

I type in "How to live a fulfilled life" about twice a week just to get the facts

L.P. Hartley, Beyonce, & Messianic Judaism top the list this week.

Go, life, go.

Wikipedia is only good for the "7 Degrees of Wikipedia"

Moose-to-Peanut Butter. I bet you can do it in 7 clicks. You are allowed to backtrack if necessary.

Did it in 4.

"It is popular in the United States where it is used mainly as a sandwich spread, and a key ingredient in the peanut butter and jelly sandwich."

THIS INFORMATION IS ACCURATE

Generally speakng, major topics and articles are heavily moderated by experts. It's the small-time articles that are usually innacurate.

I went to college with a huge contributer of wiki, perhaps one of the tops. Yes, he was a virgin, his favorite band was nine inch nails, and his grades weren't that great.

I was just thinking, the RTTP wikipedia page could use some SRS spicing up. Anybody have any relevant information to contribute? LOL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTTP

you guys are wrong. let me edited up the wiki entry to prove it.

all your facts are belong to us

I HAZ NO LIFE!

If you liked it than you shoulda put a (cock) ring on it.

Don't trust them new niggas over there.

heres the only online encyclopedia you need:
http://conservapedia.com/

lol "2007: /r/ tag introduced"

Wikipedia is a self-described online encyclopedia[1] project written and edited by an ad hoc assemblage of anonymous persons who are mostly, according to the Register (UK)[2][3], teenagers and unemployed persons. The project was initiated by two atheists: entrepreneur Jimmy Wales and philosophy professor Larry Sanger on January 15, 2001. Despite its official "neutrality policy," Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias. In his article entitled Wikipedia lies, slander continue journalist Joseph Farah stated Wikipedia "is not only a provider of inaccuracy and bias. It is wholesale purveyor of lies and slander unlike any other the world has ever known."[4] Mr. Farah has repeatedly been the victim of defamation at the Wikipedia website.[5] Wikipedia has millions of entries on topics ranging from an explanation for "duh"[6] to singles by obscure rock bands[7] to arcane British nobility.[8]