Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:


UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u  add: url  image  video(?)
: post by ArrowHead likes Pie at 2007-08-28 01:18:33
dreadkill said:
i hate when people say a show or movie sucks because they read the book.


It's not even close to that. The parts of the plot in season one that were taken directly from the books was interesting, even if they drew it out to fill an entire season. However, to fill it out, they added a lot of shit to it themselves, and the stuff they added was all campy, retarded crap that didn't really fit the overall atmosphere. Not only that, but if they repeat the same formula and use book 2 as a template for the second season, they've already screwed a couple major points which means that the second season would need to contain even MORE original material. As I said, the original stuff for the most part sucked.

I loved the books, and seeing them acted out was cool. But the terrible acting (except the guy who plays dexter) and the goofy shit they added ruined it. Also, they totally tone down all the scenes of dexter with his victims, and cut a lot out.

[default homepage] [print][9:55:10am May 25,2024
load time 0.02376 secs/10 queries]
[search][refresh page]